1. Home
  2. Policy & Regulation
  3. Petition for Adoption of tariff of Procurement of Storage Capacity from 250 MW/500 MWh Standalone Battery Energy Storage Systems – EQ
Petition for Adoption of tariff of Procurement of Storage Capacity from 250 MW/500 MWh Standalone Battery Energy Storage Systems – EQ

Petition for Adoption of tariff of Procurement of Storage Capacity from 250 MW/500 MWh Standalone Battery Energy Storage Systems – EQ

0
0

Summary:

## **Case Summary**

**Forum:** Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission (GERC), Gandhinagar
**Petition No.:** 2371 of 2024
**Date of Order:** 17 July 2025

### **Parties**

* **Petitioner:** Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited (GUVNL)
*Represented by:* Mr. Nagajan H. Parmar & Mr. Sumit D. Harwani

* **Respondent:** M/s Gensol Engineering Limited
*Representation:* None present

### **Nature of Petition**

* Filed under **Section 63** read with **Section 86(1)(b)** of the Electricity Act, 2003.
* Seeks adoption of **tariff discovered under Competitive Bidding Process** for procurement of **250 MW/500 MWh Standalone Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS)** with an **additional Greenshoe Option** of another **250 MW/500 MWh**.
* Tender process reference: **RfS No. GUVNL/BESS/Phase III dated 16.03.2024**.

### **Key Proceedings**

1. **Hearing on 27 May 2025**:

* GUVNL informed that despite time given to the respondent to execute the **Battery Energy Storage Purchase Agreement (BESPA)**, they did not come forward to sign.
* Tariff adoption order was already issued by the Commission on **03 April 2025**.
* As per bid documents, BESPA was required to be signed within **10 days** from tariff adoption (or within any mutually extended date).
* GUVNL had duly communicated with the respondent, but no action was taken from their side.

2. **Commission’s Observations**:

* Respondent was absent despite receiving the hearing notice and gave no intimation about inability to attend.
* BESPA for the **Greenshoe Option** remained unsigned.
* GUVNL submitted that they do not wish to sign the same as per RfS and BESPA provisions.

### **Decision**

* Commission noted that:

* Opportunity of hearing was sufficiently provided to the respondent.
* Petitioner had completed all required submissions and formalities.
* Matter is reserved for **appropriate orders**.

**Coram:**

* Shri S.R. Pandey, Member
* Shri Mehul M. Gandhi, Member

For more information please see below link:

Anand Gupta Editor - EQ Int'l Media Network